Evidence-based maturity assessment — what IS
Gate infrastructure, lifecycle management, prerequisite validation, Redis caching, audit integration
Consent infrastructure, evaluation service, cache invalidation, audit trail, purpose coverage
Retention policies, field classification policies, purge orchestration, per-store tracking, Kafka propagation
AuditWriter integration, resource type coverage, severity mapping, event formatting, Kafka propagation
Resource domain definitions, action patterns, role definitions, privileged operations, permission matrix
Replay control, processing checkpoints, governance API endpoints, route integration, decision context consent gate
Raw financial behavior signal collection: payment success/failure history, retry success rate, order completion vs cancellation, refund/chargeback signals, billing punctuality. Outputs: payment_behavior_rollup, transaction_outcome_rollup, billing_stability_rollup. Financial domain only — trust/compliance signals are collected separately in F19
Commitment fulfillment estimation: order value consistency, spending patterns, subscription retention, fulfillment success, commitment consistency. Outputs: financial_stability_profile, fulfillment_reliability_profile, commitment_consistency_profile. Financial domain only — trust/compliance signals are collected separately in F19
Band-based financial intelligence (NOT scores): Payment Reliability Band, Fulfillment Capacity Band, Financial Stability Band, Behavioral Risk Band. Always explainable with reason codes. These are financial domain bands only — trust/compliance bands are derived separately in F19. Output: financial_intelligence_snapshot (financial bands only)
User behavior quality tracking: abuse/fraud signals, complaint frequency, dispute patterns, policy violations, refund abuse. Outputs: trust_behavior_profile, compliance_signal_snapshot. Derived: Trust Band + Compliance Band with reason codes. Trust/compliance is a SEPARATE domain from financial intelligence (F16-F18) — these bands may be composed with financial bands in F20 but domain ownership stays independent
Composition layer only — assembles financial signals (F16-F18) and trust/compliance signals (F19) into decision-support snapshots. Does NOT merge domain ownership — financial and trust domains remain independent. FUIP provides signals only, it does NOT approve or deny. Outputs: sponsorship_support_snapshot, subscription_eligibility_snapshot
MANDATORY governance layer: reason code registry, explainability API, decision usage audit trail, consent-aware purpose-based filtering, purpose tagging, signal drift monitoring. Every band must have reason codes. Every usage must be audited. Internal operational signals processed under approved purpose/policy controls; external/sponsor/third-party outputs require appropriate consent, lawful basis, and purpose control. Every read path must be purpose-tagged
Controlled action policy framework: band-to-action mapping, premium feature gating, payment mode selection, transparency enforcement. NEVER punish silently — every restriction must produce a user-facing explanation with reason codes
| Capability | Score | Weight | Status | Evidence Hint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gate Infrastructure
PG table fuip.activation_gates (11 cols, UNIQUE tenant_id+gate_key), PostgreSQLActivationGateRepository wired in DI
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | Migration 022: 20260404_fuip_governance_tables.sql, DI: PostgreSQLActivationGateRepository |
|
Gate Lifecycle Management
Activate/suspend/list/check operations via ActivationGateService (5 methods) + AdminGovernanceGateAction endpoint
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
25 | Production | ActivationGateServiceTest: 5 tests, AdminGovernanceGateAction: POST /api/v1/fuip/admin/governance/gate |
|
Gate Prerequisite Validation
Prerequisites checked before gate activation, RuntimeException thrown on unmet prerequisites
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | ActivationGateServiceTest: testActivateChecksPrerequisites |
|
Gate Redis Caching
Gate status cached at fuip:gate:{t}:{gk} with 300s TTL, RedisGovernanceCache integration
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
15 | Production | RedisGovernanceCacheTest: testGateStatusCacheWith300sTtl |
|
Gate Audit Trail
Gate state changes produce audit events via FuipAuditIntegrationService with high severity for activate/suspend
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | FuipAuditIntegrationService: auditGovernanceOperation, severity=high for activate/suspend |
| Capability | Score | Weight | Status | Evidence Hint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Consent Infrastructure
PG table fuip.subject_consent_states (10 cols, UNIQUE tenant_id+subject_id), PostgreSQLConsentRepository with jsonb @> operator
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | Migration 022: fuip.subject_consent_states, DI: PostgreSQLConsentRepository |
|
Consent Evaluation Service
isConsentedFor() with Redis-first lookup + PG fallback, recordConsent/revokeAll lifecycle methods
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
25 | Production | ConsentEvaluationServiceTest: 5 tests covering check, record, revoke, cache |
|
Consent Cache Invalidation
Redis key fuip:consent:{t}:{s} (600s TTL) invalidated on recordConsent and revokeAll operations
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | ConsentEvaluationServiceTest: testRecordConsentPersistsAndInvalidatesCache |
|
Consent Audit Trail
Consent changes audited via FuipAuditIntegrationService + Kafka produce to fuip.governance.audit topic (#29)
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
15 | Production | ConsentEvaluationService: produce to fuip.governance.audit |
|
Consent Purpose Coverage
All 7 ConsentPurpose enum cases handled: ANALYTICS, PERSONALIZATION, EXPERIMENTATION, COGNITIVE_PROCESSING, CROSS_DEVICE_TRACKING, ADVERTISING, SAFETY
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | GovernanceContractTest: testConsentPurposeHas7Cases |
| Capability | Score | Weight | Status | Evidence Hint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Retention Policy Framework
PG table fuip.retention_classes (10 cols, UNIQUE tenant_id+data_category) + 6 RetentionTier enum levels: EPHEMERAL through PERMANENT
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | Migration 022: fuip.retention_classes, RetentionTier enum: 6 cases |
|
Field Policy Framework
PG table fuip.telemetry_field_policies (9 cols) with allowlist/denylist support, GovernancePolicyRepository (6 methods)
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | Migration 022: fuip.telemetry_field_policies, PostgreSQLGovernancePolicyRepository: 6 methods |
|
Purge Orchestration
Submit/execute/status/inventory lifecycle via PurgeOrchestrationService, PG table fuip.purge_requests (11 cols)
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
25 | Production | PurgeOrchestrationServiceTest: 4 tests, AdminPurgeAction: POST /api/v1/fuip/admin/purge |
|
Purge Store Tracking
Per-store execution log tracking purge across PG, ClickHouse, Redis, and Kafka stores
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
15 | Production | PurgeOrchestrationService: executePurge with per-store stubs |
|
Purge Event Propagation
Purge lifecycle events produced to fuip.governance.purge Kafka topic (#28) for downstream consumers
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | PurgeOrchestrationServiceTest: testSubmitPurgeCreatesRequest |
| Capability | Score | Weight | Status | Evidence Hint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AuditWriter Integration
FuipAuditIntegrationService with nullable AuditWriter injection, 3 public methods: auditRegistryMutation, auditGovernanceOperation, auditPrivilegedAccess
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | DI: nullable AuditWriter pattern, FuipAuditIntegrationService: 3 public methods |
|
Resource Type Coverage
36 auditable resource types registered across all FUIP layers, event type format: FUIP_{RESOURCE_TYPE}_{ACTION}
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
25 | Production | FuipAuditIntegrationService: 36 resource types across all FUIP layers |
|
Severity Auto-Mapping
Dynamic severity assignment: high for delete/purge/block/rollback/merge, medium for create/activate/deactivate, low for others
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | FuipAuditIntegrationServiceTest: 5 tests covering severity mapping |
|
Event Type Formatting
Consistent FUIP_{RESOURCE_TYPE}_{ACTION} naming convention for all audit events across the platform
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
15 | Production | FuipAuditIntegrationServiceTest: testEventTypeFormatting |
|
Audit Kafka Propagation
Governance audit events produced to fuip.governance.audit Kafka topic (#29) from ConsentEvaluationService and PurgeOrchestrationService
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | ConsentEvaluationService + PurgeOrchestrationService: Kafka produce to fuip.governance.audit |
| Capability | Score | Weight | Status | Evidence Hint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAM Resource Domains
25 resource domains defined in FuipIamResourceDefinition covering telemetry, behavior, experiments, decisions, features, algorithms, safety, governance
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | FuipIamResourceDefinitionTest: testHas25ResourceDomains |
|
IAM Action Patterns
11 action patterns defined: read, list, create, update, delete, activate, deactivate, execute, export, configure, purge
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | FuipIamResourceDefinitionTest: testHas11ActionPatterns |
|
IAM Role Definitions
4 predefined roles with layered inheritance: viewer -> analyst -> operator -> admin, permissions computed dynamically
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | FuipIamResourceDefinitionTest: testHas4PredefinedRoles, FuipIamRoleSeed: layered inheritance |
|
Privileged Operations
10 privileged operations identified and tracked via isPrivileged(domain, action) method for elevated audit
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | FuipIamResourceDefinitionTest: testHas10PrivilegedOperations |
|
Permission Matrix Completeness
Full PERMISSION_MATRIX covering all 25 resource domains with action-level granularity per role
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | FuipIamResourceDefinitionTest: testPermissionMatrixCoversAllDomains |
| Capability | Score | Weight | Status | Evidence Hint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Replay Control
Initiate/status/list operations via AdminReplayAction, PG table fuip.replay_control (16 cols), PostgreSQLReplayControlRepository (6 methods)
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | AdminReplayAction: POST /api/v1/fuip/admin/replay, ReplayControlRepositoryTest: 3 tests |
|
Processing Checkpoints
PG table fuip.processing_checkpoints (11 cols, UNIQUE tenant_id+processor_key+partition_id) for consumer offset tracking
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | Migration 023: fuip.processing_checkpoints, ProcessingCheckpointRepositoryTest |
|
Governance API Endpoints
3 admin POST endpoints registered: /admin/governance/gate, /admin/replay, /admin/purge with action-based routing
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
25 | Production | routes/api/fuip/governance.php: 3 route definitions |
|
Route Integration
Governance routes wired in FUIP route group at routes/api/fuip.php, 8th phase require after safety
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
15 | Production | routes/api/fuip.php: governance require (8 phase requires total) |
|
Decision Context Consent Gate
Non-blocking consent check in DecisionContextAssemblyService via logConsentStatus(), nullable ConsentEvaluationServiceInterface injection
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Production | DecisionContextAssemblyService: logConsentStatus(), backward-compatible nullable param |
| Capability | Score | Weight | Status | Evidence Hint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Payment Success/Failure History
Track payment outcomes (success, failure, decline) per user over time with payment_behavior_rollup read model aggregation
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
25 | Missing | FUTURE: payment_behavior_rollup read model, Kafka consumer from payment events |
|
Retry Success Rate
Measure payment retry patterns and their success rates after initial failure, feeding into transaction_outcome_rollup
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: retry pattern tracking in transaction_outcome_rollup read model |
|
Order Completion vs Cancellation
Track order lifecycle completion rates and cancellation patterns per user, feeding into transaction_outcome_rollup
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: order lifecycle event consumer, completion/cancellation ratio tracking |
|
Refund & Chargeback Signals
Monitor refund frequency, chargeback disputes, and dispute resolution outcomes feeding into payment_behavior_rollup
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: refund/chargeback event consumer, dispute signal aggregation |
|
Billing Punctuality
Track subscription billing timeliness, late payment patterns, and billing regularity feeding into billing_stability_rollup
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
15 | Missing | FUTURE: billing_stability_rollup read model, subscription billing event consumer |
| Capability | Score | Weight | Status | Evidence Hint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Order Value Consistency
Track spending patterns and order value distribution stability over time, detect anomalous shifts in financial_stability_profile
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: order value distribution tracking, stability coefficient in financial_stability_profile |
|
Spending Pattern Analysis
Analyze frequency vs value stability over rolling windows, detect spending velocity changes (not income, only behavioral patterns)
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: rolling window frequency/value analysis, spending velocity change detection |
|
Subscription Retention
Monitor subscription continuity, churn patterns, and plan upgrade/downgrade behavior feeding into commitment_consistency_profile
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: subscription lifecycle tracking, churn/retention rates, plan change patterns |
|
Fulfillment Success Tracking
Track delivery completion, attendance, usage fulfillment across order types in fulfillment_reliability_profile read model
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: fulfillment_reliability_profile, delivery/attendance/usage completion tracking |
|
Commitment Consistency Profile
Aggregate commitment behavior signals (delivery + attendance + usage) into commitment_consistency_profile with rolling window computation
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: commitment_consistency_profile aggregation service, rolling window computation |
| Capability | Score | Weight | Status | Evidence Hint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Payment Reliability Band
Derive LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH financial band from payment success rate, retry patterns, refund ratio. Always accompanied by reason codes (e.g., HIGH_PAYMENT_SUCCESS, LOW_REFUND_RATIO). Financial domain only
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
25 | Missing | FUTURE: PaymentReliabilityBandDeriver service, consumes payment_behavior_rollup, outputs LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH + reason codes (financial domain) |
|
Fulfillment Capacity Band
Derive LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH financial band from fulfillment success rates, delivery completion, commitment consistency with explainable reason codes. Financial domain only
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: FulfillmentCapacityBandDeriver, consumes fulfillment_reliability_profile + commitment_consistency_profile (financial domain) |
|
Financial Stability Band
Derive LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH financial band from spending patterns, order value consistency, billing punctuality with explainable reason codes. Financial domain only
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: FinancialStabilityBandDeriver, consumes financial_stability_profile + billing_stability_rollup (financial domain) |
|
Behavioral Risk Band
Derive LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH behavioral risk band from combined platform behavioral signals. Explicitly non-credit, non-income, non-financial-judgment — based only on observable platform behavior patterns. Financial domain only
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: BehavioralRiskBandDeriver, composite from all F16/F17 behavioral signals, explicitly non-credit non-income (financial domain) |
|
Financial Intelligence Snapshot API
Read-only API assembling financial domain bands with reason codes into financial_intelligence_snapshot. Covers financial bands only (payment reliability, fulfillment capacity, financial stability, behavioral risk). Trust/compliance bands are served separately from F19. Example: {payment_reliability: HIGH, reasons: ["95% success rate", "low refund ratio"]}
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
15 | Missing | FUTURE: GET /api/v1/fuip/financial-intelligence/snapshot, read-only, returns financial bands only + reason codes. Trust bands served separately from F19 |
| Capability | Score | Weight | Status | Evidence Hint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Abuse & Fraud Signal Collection
Detect and record abuse patterns, fraud indicators, and system misuse signals into trust_behavior_profile read model. Trust/compliance domain — separate from financial signals (F16-F18)
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
25 | Missing | FUTURE: abuse pattern detector, consumes safety signals (F13) + behavioral signals, feeds trust_behavior_profile (trust/compliance domain) |
|
Complaint & Dispute Tracking
Track complaint frequency, dispute patterns, resolution outcomes, and escalation rates per user over time. Trust/compliance domain
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: complaint/dispute event consumer, frequency and resolution tracking (trust/compliance domain) |
|
Policy Violation Monitoring
Monitor policy violations, ToS breaches, refund abuse, and compliance infractions feeding into compliance_signal_snapshot. Trust/compliance domain
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: policy violation event consumer, compliance_signal_snapshot aggregation (trust/compliance domain) |
|
Trust Band Derivation
Derive HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW trust band from abuse, complaint, and violation signals. Separate from financial bands (F18). Example: trust_band=LOW, reasons=[HIGH_REFUND_ABUSE, MULTIPLE_DISPUTES]. Trust/compliance domain
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: TrustBandDeriver service, consumes trust_behavior_profile, outputs band + reason codes (trust/compliance domain, separate from F18 financial bands) |
|
Compliance Band Derivation
Derive compliance band from policy adherence, dispute resolution patterns, and refund abuse indicators with reason codes. Trust/compliance domain — separate from financial bands (F18)
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
15 | Missing | FUTURE: ComplianceBandDeriver, consumes compliance_signal_snapshot, outputs band + reason codes (trust/compliance domain) |
| Capability | Score | Weight | Status | Evidence Hint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sponsor Suitability Signals
Compose financial bands (F18) + trust bands (F19) into sponsor suitability indicators for sponsor/lender eligibility assessment (NOT approval/denial). Composition layer — does not merge domain ownership
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
25 | Missing | FUTURE: SponsorSuitabilityService, composes F18 financial bands + F19 trust bands, signal-only (no approve/deny), composition layer |
|
Payment Affordability Indicator
Behavioral-only payment affordability indicator derived from platform behavioral/payment history signals. Does NOT use income data, does NOT use external credit bureau data, does NOT infer formal credit score. Based solely on observable platform behavior (spending patterns, billing punctuality, financial stability band)
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: PaymentAffordabilityIndicator, behavioral-only, no income data, no credit bureau data, no formal credit score inference, platform signals only |
|
Subscription Affordability Indicators
Signal-based subscription tier suitability (prepaid/standard/premium) composed from financial stability band + billing punctuality signals + trust band. Composition layer — does not merge domain ownership
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: SubscriptionAffordabilityIndicator, composes F18 financial_stability band + billing_stability_rollup + F19 trust band, composition layer |
|
Commitment Risk Indicators
Forward-looking risk indicators composed from commitment history, financial stability bands (F18), and trust/compliance bands (F19) for long-term commitment assessment. Composition layer
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
15 | Missing | FUTURE: CommitmentRiskIndicator, composes F18 financial bands + F19 trust bands + commitment_consistency_profile, composition layer |
|
Decision Support Snapshot APIs
Read-only APIs: sponsorship_support_snapshot + subscription_eligibility_snapshot. Composes financial bands (F18) + trust bands (F19) but does not merge domain ownership. FUIP provides signals only — consuming systems make decisions
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: GET /api/v1/fuip/decision-support/sponsorship, GET /api/v1/fuip/decision-support/subscription-eligibility, composition layer only |
| Capability | Score | Weight | Status | Evidence Hint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Reason Code Registry
Structured registry of all reason codes (HIGH_PAYMENT_SUCCESS, LOW_DISPUTE_RATE, CONSISTENT_ACTIVITY, HIGH_REFUND_ABUSE, etc.) with categories and human-readable descriptions
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: ReasonCodeRegistry enum/table, categorized codes with human-readable descriptions |
|
Explainability API
API endpoint returning band values + human-readable reason codes for any financial/trust intelligence query. Example: {"reason_codes": ["HIGH_PAYMENT_SUCCESS", "LOW_DISPUTE_RATE"]}
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: GET /api/v1/fuip/financial-intelligence/explain/{subject_id}, returns bands + reason_codes array |
|
Decision Usage Audit Trail
Audit log capturing every downstream system that consumes financial/trust intelligence signals — who queried, what bands, for what purpose, at what time
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
15 | Missing | FUTURE: FuipAuditIntegrationService extension for financial/trust intelligence queries, Kafka topic for audit events |
|
Consent-Aware Purpose-Based Filtering
Purpose-based filtering of financial/trust intelligence outputs via FUIP F2 consent governance integration. Internal operational and governance-safe signals may be processed under approved internal purpose and policy controls. External-facing, sponsor-facing, advertiser-facing, and third-party-facing outputs require appropriate consent, lawful basis, and purpose control. Every read path must be purpose-tagged. External exposure must be filtered by consent/purpose rules
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
15 | Missing | FUTURE: ConsentEvaluationService integration, internal signals under policy controls, external outputs under consent/lawful basis/purpose rules |
|
Purpose Tagging
Tag every intelligence query/response with purpose (eligibility, risk_assessment, sponsorship, subscription, internal_governance) for compliance tracking and audit
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
15 | Missing | FUTURE: PurposeTag enum (eligibility, risk_assessment, sponsorship, subscription, internal_governance), attached to every API request/response |
|
Financial & Trust Signal Drift Monitoring
Governance-level signal drift monitoring (not ML model drift). Detects drift in band distributions over time, signal instability across rolling windows, and degradation in reliability of derived indicators. Feeds Quality Center and governance review for investigation. Non-blocking initially — observe mode only
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
15 | Missing | FUTURE: SignalDriftMonitor, tracks band distribution change, signal instability, reliability degradation. Governance support (not ML). Non-blocking observe mode initially, feeds Quality Center |
| Capability | Score | Weight | Status | Evidence Hint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Band-to-Action Policy Mapping
Define policy rules mapping band values (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) to allowed/restricted actions per use case. Configurable via governance dashboard, not hardcoded
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
25 | Missing | FUTURE: ActionPolicyEngine, configurable band-to-action rules, governance dashboard integration |
|
Premium Feature Gating
HIGH trust/reliability -> allow premium features. LOW trust -> restrict risky operations. Always with explanation via F21 explainability layer
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: PremiumFeatureGate, consumes trust + reliability bands, integrates F21 explainability |
|
Payment Mode Selection
HIGH reliability -> allow subscription/credit plans. LOW reliability -> require prepaid. Policy-driven, not hardcoded, always with user-facing explanation
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: PaymentModePolicy, consumes payment_reliability band, policy-driven mode selection |
|
Transparency Enforcement
MANDATORY: every restriction must produce a user-facing explanation. No silent punishment. TransparencyGuard validates every action policy execution includes reason codes
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
20 | Missing | FUTURE: TransparencyGuard middleware, validates explanation presence on every restriction, blocks silent punishment |
|
Policy Audit Trail
Audit log of every action policy execution: band values used, reason codes generated, action taken, user notified. Integrates with F4 Audit + F21 governance layer
|
0
1
2
3
4
5
|
15 | Missing | FUTURE: PolicyAuditService, integrates F4 AuditWriter + F21 purpose tagging, Kafka topic for policy execution events |